ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on fit and comfort, Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on breathability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior cushioning and performance, making it the better choice for serious runners, while the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is a budget-friendly option that still provides comfort.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS has PureGEL technology that is 65% softer.
Weight
ASICS is approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor.
Brand Reputation
ASICS has a higher sales rank, indicating popularity.
Why Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Brooks is $78.20 cheaper.
Breathability
Brooks features an engineered air mesh upper.
Sustainability
Brooks uses recycled silica in its outsole.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Nimbus 28 | Trace 4 |
| Cushioning Tech | PureGEL | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Knit | Air Mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic Rubber | RoadTack Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes retail for $169.95, while the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe is priced at $91.75. This means that the Brooks shoe is about 46% cheaper than the ASICS model. If budget is a significant factor for you, the Brooks shoe presents a compelling option without sacrificing comfort and performance. Considering both shoes offer unique features and benefits, the price difference is substantial enough to influence a buyer's decision, especially for those looking to save money while still investing in quality running footwear.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels with its PureGEL technology and FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, which provides a softer and more cushioned experience. The ASICS model is designed to feel like you're landing on clouds, making it an excellent choice for long-distance runs. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 features DNA LOFT v2 soft cushioning, which adapts to your unique stride for lasting comfort. Both shoes prioritize cushioning, but the ASICS model claims to be approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, giving it an edge in plushness.
Weight and Performance
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor, enhancing its performance for runners seeking speed. While the specific weight of the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 isn't provided, the use of lightweight materials such as the breathable mesh upper aims to deliver a secure fit without adding unnecessary bulk. For runners focused on performance and agility, the ASICS model may offer a slight advantage, making it suitable for those who prioritize speed and comfort in their runs.
Breathability and Fit
Both shoes provide excellent breathability, but they do so in slightly different ways. The ASICS model features an engineered knit upper that reduces the need for additional overlays, enhancing airflow and comfort. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 includes an engineered air mesh upper designed to keep runners dry and comfortable. While both options promote breathability, the ASICS shoe’s construction may offer a more form-fitting experience, which could be beneficial for runners who prefer a snug fit.
Durability and Outsole
Durability is a key factor in running shoes, and both models have features that enhance their longevity. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is constructed with a synthetic rubber outsole, while the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 boasts a RoadTack rubber outsole designed for durability and lightweight performance. Although both outsoles are built to withstand the rigors of running, the Brooks shoe's use of recycled silica could appeal to environmentally conscious consumers. Overall, the durability of both shoes is commendable, making either a good choice for consistent runners.
Style and Aesthetics
In terms of aesthetics, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is available in a Mineral Beige/Cream color scheme, offering a more classic and neutral look. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 comes in a bold White/Oyster/Rose combination, appealing to those who prefer a more vibrant style. The visual appeal of each shoe may come down to personal preference, with ASICS leaning towards subtlety and Brooks embracing a bolder statement. Both styles are designed to be versatile enough for various running environments.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 has a sales rank of 11,265, while the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 ranks at 12,197. Both brands are well-respected in the running community, known for their commitment to quality and innovation. The slight difference in sales rank suggests that both models are competitive choices among consumers. ASICS may have a slight edge in popularity with its Gel-Nimbus line, which has a long-standing reputation for comfort and performance, while Brooks continues to establish itself with appealing designs and reliable performance.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, your choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 will depend on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize plush cushioning, lightweight performance, and a snug fit, the ASICS model may be worth the higher price tag at $169.95. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that still delivers comfort and durability, the Brooks shoe at $91.75 offers excellent value. Both shoes excel in their own right, but understanding what you need most in a running shoe will guide you to the right decision.

