ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on comfort and durability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior cushioning and advanced features for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is a budget-friendly option for casual use.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features PureGEL technology for softer cushioning.
Weight
ASICS is lighter, enhancing performance.
Fit Technology
ASICS includes OrthoLite X-55 for better moisture management.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper.
Everyday Comfort
New Balance is designed for casual runners.
Breathability
New Balance uses a breathable textile upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | PureGEL & FF BLAST PLUS | Fresh Foam |
| Upper Material | Engineered knit | Textile & mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic rubber | Integrated rubber |
| Weight | Lighter | Heavier |
| Moisture Management | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is priced at $169.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is significantly cheaper at $72.24, making it about 57% less expensive. As the ASICS model ranks 11,265 in sales, it offers premium features designed for serious runners, whereas the New Balance model, with a sales rank of 13,435, focuses on comfort and everyday use. This article will explore the key differences and similarities between these two popular running shoes.
Design and Construction
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 features an engineered knit upper that enhances breathability and reduces the need for additional overlays. This construction aims to provide a snug fit that wraps the foot comfortably. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 utilizes a breathable textile upper and a premium molded engineered mesh upper, ensuring comfort during runs. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but ASICS leans towards a more advanced knit design, while New Balance opts for a traditional mesh build.
Cushioning Technology
Cushioning is a critical aspect of running shoes, and both models employ unique technologies. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 is equipped with PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, offering a cloud-like cushioning experience. Additionally, the FF BLAST PLUS cushioning enhances the responsiveness of the ride. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 features Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, engineered for an ultra-cushioned, lightweight ride. While both shoes excel in cushioning, ASICS provides a more advanced and softer option, ideal for long-distance runners.
Weight and Performance
The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 is about 25 grams lighter than its predecessor, emphasizing a lightweight feel that enhances performance during runs. This reduction in weight contributes to a faster, more agile running experience. Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 focuses more on everyday comfort rather than weight reduction, making it suitable for casual runners who prioritize stability over speed. For those seeking performance, the ASICS model offers a notable edge.
Fit and Comfort
In terms of fit, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 features an OrthoLite X-55 sockliner, which provides superior cushioning and moisture management, ensuring a cool and dry environment for your feet. This additional feature enhances comfort, especially during longer runs. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 has a lace closure system that offers a customizable fit, but lacks the advanced moisture management features of the ASICS model. Thus, while both shoes provide comfort, the Gel-Nimbus 28 takes the lead in terms of specialized fit technology.
Outsole and Traction
When it comes to traction, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 has a synthetic rubber outsole that is designed for durability and grip on various surfaces. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 features an integrated rubber outsole, which also supports underfoot comfort. Both outsoles are effective, but the ASICS model's synthetic rubber may provide better durability for those who run on a variety of terrains. If you prioritize long-lasting traction, the ASICS option may be the better choice.
Price Comparison
The price difference between these two models is significant: the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 retails for $169.95, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 is available for $72.24. This makes the New Balance model about 57% cheaper than the ASICS version. While the ASICS model offers advanced technology and premium features, the New Balance option provides excellent value for those seeking an economical running shoe without compromising on comfort.
Target Audience
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is designed for serious runners who require advanced cushioning and support over longer distances, making it ideal for those training for marathons or regular long runs. Its features cater to performance-oriented individuals looking for an edge in their running experience. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is perfect for casual runners or those who prefer a comfortable shoe for daily wear. It emphasizes ease of use and comfort, making it suitable for less intense running activities or casual outings.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're a dedicated runner seeking premium features and advanced cushioning, the ASICS model is worth the investment at $169.95. However, if you’re looking for a comfortable and budget-friendly option for casual running or everyday wear, the New Balance model at $72.24 is an excellent choice. Consider what aspects of a running shoe are most important to you—performance or affordability—to make the best decision.

