ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running leads on support and durability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers a budget-friendly option with decent comfort, while the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 provides advanced support and cushioning for serious runners.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
price
ASICS is $69.95, 39% cheaper than Brooks at $114.95
weight
Gel-Pulse 17 is lighter than Glycerin GTS 22
casual use
Gel-Pulse 17 is suitable for daily wear
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better
cushioning
Glycerin GTS 22 features advanced DNA Tuned technology
support
Glycerin GTS 22 includes GuideRails for stability
fit
Glycerin GTS 22 has a more accommodating upper design
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Pulse 17 | Glycerin GTS 22 |
| Upper | Mesh | Double Jacquard Knit |
| Outsole | Molded Rubber | Broad Platform |
| Technology | AMPLIFOAM PLUS | DNA Tuned |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is priced at $69.95, making it about 39% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22, which costs $114.95. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious buyers while still offering key features for performance and comfort.
The Gel-Pulse 17 is designed for comfort during daily wear, featuring AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning that enhances impact absorption. In contrast, the Glycerin GTS 22 focuses on providing a luxurious running experience with its DNA Tuned midsole technology and GuideRails support system that helps stabilize the foot during movement.
Comfort and Cushioning
Both running shoes emphasize comfort, but they approach it differently. The Gel-Pulse 17 incorporates AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which is engineered for softness and comfort, enhancing the overall ride. This shoe also features rearfoot GEL technology that absorbs shocks, making it suitable for casual runners and those who spend long hours on their feet.
On the other hand, the Glycerin GTS 22 boasts a more advanced cushioning system. Its DNA Tuned technology integrates dual-size cells to provide a plush landing and a responsive toe-off, making it ideal for serious runners seeking a premium experience. Additionally, the Glycerin GTS 22 includes a broad platform for smooth transitions, reinforcing its focus on stability and support during runs.
Fit and Sizing
When it comes to fit, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 has a standard design that caters to a variety of foot shapes. It incorporates a mesh upper that allows for breathability, providing comfort during extended wear.
Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 features an engineered double jacquard knit upper that is designed for a flexible and accommodating fit. This shoe aims to provide enhanced durability and breathability, making it suitable for a wider range of activities beyond just running. The additional focus on fit may be particularly appealing to those with specific sizing needs or those who prioritize a snug feel.
Support Features
Support is a crucial factor for many runners, and the two shoes differ significantly in this regard. The Gel-Pulse 17 does not explicitly highlight any unique support features, relying instead on its cushioning technologies to provide comfort.
In contrast, the Glycerin GTS 22 introduces the innovative GuideRails support system. This feature actively works to keep excess motion in check, providing holistic support that helps stabilize the foot during various activities. This makes the Glycerin GTS 22 an excellent choice for runners who may require additional support to prevent injuries or discomfort during their runs.
Breathability and Temperature Control
Breathability is vital for maintaining comfort during physical activities. The Gel-Pulse 17's mesh upper contributes to airflow, helping to keep feet cooler and more comfortable over time. This feature is beneficial for casual wear and light running sessions.
The Glycerin GTS 22 takes breathability a step further with its engineered double jacquard knit upper, designed to enhance airflow while providing a flexible fit. This feature ensures that runners can maintain a comfortable temperature, especially during longer runs or in warmer conditions, making it an attractive option for serious athletes.
Durability and Outsole Design
Durability is an essential aspect of any running shoe, and both models are built to last. The Gel-Pulse 17 features a molded rubber outsole that provides reliable traction and durability, making it suitable for various surfaces.
The Glycerin GTS 22 also emphasizes durability, with its broad platform and tuned heel that not only enhance stability but also contribute to the shoe's longevity. This model is ideal for those who plan to put in significant mileage, as it is built to withstand the rigors of regular use while maintaining performance.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is priced at $69.95, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is available for $114.95. This places the Gel-Pulse 17 at about 39% lower in price, making it a more budget-friendly option for consumers. While the Glycerin GTS 22 offers advanced technology and features, the significant price difference may be a deciding factor for those who are looking for value without compromising on essential performance aspects.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a more affordable option that still provides comfort and basic performance, the Gel-Pulse 17 is an excellent choice. However, if you are a dedicated runner seeking advanced support and cushioning technology for enhanced performance, the Glycerin GTS 22 justifies its higher price. The decision hinges on whether you prioritize budget or advanced features in your running shoes.

