vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running

Updated August 2026 — New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running leads on comfort and cushioning.

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 offers superior comfort and advanced features, making it the better choice for serious runners. However, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is a budget-friendly option.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better

price

ASICS is $60 cheaper

weight

ASICS has a lighter build

durability

Molded rubber outsole in ASICS

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running is better

comfort

Fresh Foam X provides superior cushioning

breathability

Engineered mesh upper enhances airflow

sales rank

New Balance ranks significantly higher in sales

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
70
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
CushioningAMPLIFOAM PLUSFresh Foam X
Upper MaterialMeshSynthetic/Engineered Mesh
Sales Rank124671578
AdjustabilityStandardAdjustable Lace
Shock AbsorptionRearfoot GELFresh Foam X

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running Shoe comes in at $129.99. This makes the ASICS model about 46% cheaper than the New Balance option. For budget-conscious consumers, the lower price point of the ASICS shoes could be a significant factor. However, it's worth noting that the New Balance model justifies its higher price with advanced technology and features aimed at enhancing performance and comfort.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 is designed with a Fresh Foam X midsole that offers a highly cushioned experience, making it ideal for both daily runs and race day. Its focus on smooth transitions from landing to push-off suggests a premium level of comfort that may appeal to serious runners. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which provides good comfort and impact absorption but may not deliver the same level of cushioning as the Fresh Foam X. Therefore, if ultimate comfort during long runs is your priority, the New Balance may be the preferable choice.

Material and Build Quality

The build quality of both shoes reflects their brand's commitment to performance. The New Balance model features a synthetic and engineered mesh upper with no-sew overlays, which enhances breathability and reduces weight. Its gusseted tongue is also designed to keep debris out, making it suitable for various running environments. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 utilizes a mesh upper and includes features like a molded rubber outsole for durability. While both shoes are well-constructed, the advanced materials in the New Balance may offer a slight edge in performance and comfort over extended wear.

Performance Features

When it comes to performance features, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 shines with its high-performance focus. The shoe's midsole cushioning is crafted to provide a smooth running experience, which can enhance overall running efficiency. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is equipped with Rearfoot GEL technology, aimed at shock absorption and cushioning. Although both shoes offer features that enhance performance, the New Balance model is specifically designed for versatility, making it suitable for both casual and competitive running.

Breathability

Breathability is a crucial factor for runners, especially in warm weather. The New Balance model includes an engineered mesh upper, which is designed to enhance airflow and keep your feet cool during runs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 also has a mesh upper but does not emphasize breathability to the same extent as the New Balance. Therefore, if you prioritize breathability and moisture management in running shoes, the New Balance is likely the better option.

Fit and Adjustability

Fit and adjustability play significant roles in a runner's experience. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 features an adjustable lace closure, allowing for a customized fit that can accommodate various foot shapes and sizes. The ASICS, while designed for comfort, does not specifically mention features aimed at adjustability, which may impact the overall fit for some users. For runners who have specific fit requirements or prefer a tailored feel, the New Balance offers a distinct advantage.

Sales Rank and Popularity

In terms of popularity, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 ranks significantly higher on sales charts, holding a bestseller rank of 1578 compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, which sits at 12467. This difference indicates a stronger consumer preference for the New Balance model, possibly due to its reputation for high performance and comfort. If having a shoe that is widely recognized and trusted is important to you, the New Balance may be the more appealing option.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 comes down to individual needs and preferences. If you're looking for a budget-friendly option that still delivers decent comfort, the ASICS model may be the way to go. However, if you're willing to invest more for superior comfort, advanced technology, and better performance features, the New Balance is likely the better choice. Consider your running habits, budget, and what features matter most to you before making a decision.