vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running leads on comfort and support.

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers great value and stability, while the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 excels in cushioning and support.

Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Price

ASICS is $15 cheaper than Brooks.

Weight

ASICS is lighter due to engineered mesh.

Stability

ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for stability.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Cushioning

Brooks features DNA Tuned technology for plush landings.

Support

Brooks has GuideRails for enhanced support.

Popularity

Brooks is ranked higher in sales at 2,097.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,
78
Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGT-1000 14Glycerin GTS 22
Sales Rank185582097
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshDouble Jacquard Knit
Cushion TypeFF BLASTDNA Tuned

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Overview of the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is priced at $99.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22, which retails for $114.95. Both shoes are designed for running, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. The ASICS model is focused on stability and comfort, ideal for everyday runners, while the Brooks shoe emphasizes luxurious cushioning and support tailored for smoother transitions.

Comfort and Cushioning

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 features FF BLAST cushioning, offering a blend of cloud-like comfort and a responsive ride. This makes it suitable for long distances, as the cushioning adapts to the runner's needs. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 utilizes DNA Tuned technology, which integrates dual-size cells to provide luxurious cushioning and energetic toe-offs. This advanced cushioning system is designed to ensure a plush landing, making it ideal for runners who prioritize comfort during their workouts.

Support Features

Support is a critical element for runners, and both models excel in this area. The ASICS GT-1000 14 incorporates a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that enhances stability through controlled deformation, catering to runners who need additional support. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features the innovative GuideRails support system, which helps maintain a natural motion path while minimizing excess movement. This dual approach to support makes both shoes suitable for various running styles and preferences.

Breathability and Fit

When it comes to breathability, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is constructed with an engineered mesh upper to promote airflow while reducing the need for additional overlays. This design contributes to a lightweight feel, which is essential for long runs. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22, however, boasts a double jacquard knit upper that not only enhances breathability but also provides a flexible and accommodating fit. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who may require a bit more room or who have foot shapes that vary widely.

Durability and Material Quality

Durability is a vital factor for running shoes, and both the ASICS GT-1000 14 and Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 are built with high-quality materials. The ASICS model is grounded with a durable synthetic rubber outsole, ensuring it can withstand regular use on various surfaces. Meanwhile, the Brooks shoe also emphasizes durability with its engineered upper, which combines breathability and robustness. Runners can expect both models to offer longevity, although the specific material compositions differ.

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is priced at $99.95, which is significantly lower than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 at $114.95. This price difference of $15 highlights the ASICS model as a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing essential features. For runners who are mindful of their spending, the ASICS model offers great value, especially for those looking for a reliable running shoe.

Sales Rankings and Popularity

In terms of sales rankings, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is notably more popular, ranked at 2,097, compared to the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14, which is ranked at 18,558. This suggests that the Brooks model has captured the attention of more consumers, likely due to its reputation for comfort and support. Popularity can often be a consideration for buyers, as it may reflect overall satisfaction and performance in real-world conditions.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize affordability and a blend of comfort and stability, the ASICS model at $99.95 may be the better choice. Conversely, if you seek superior cushioning and support for smoother transitions, and are willing to invest a bit more at $114.95, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 could be more aligned with your running style. Both shoes offer excellent features, but your decision should reflect your running habits and personal comfort preferences.