vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running

Updated August 2026 — New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running leads on cushioning and breathability.

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers better stability and is more budget-friendly, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 excels in cushioning and comfort.

Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Price

ASICS is about 23% cheaper.

Stability

ASICS has a superior stability system.

Weight

ASICS is designed to be lightweight.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running is better

Cushioning

New Balance offers superior cushioning.

Sales Rank

New Balance has a higher sales rank.

Eco-Friendly

New Balance uses bio-based content.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,
75
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
BrandASICSNew Balance
ModelGT-1000 14Fresh Foam X 1080 V14
Sales Rank185581578
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshSynthetic Mesh
MidsoleFF BLASTFresh Foam X

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $99.95, making them about 23% cheaper than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running Shoe, which retails for $129.99. This price difference could be a significant factor for budget-conscious buyers looking for quality running shoes. While both shoes offer unique features aimed at enhancing comfort and performance, the ASICS shoe allows runners to save more upfront without sacrificing on essential qualities.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running Shoe takes the lead with its Fresh Foam X midsole. This technology offers a plush cushioning experience that is designed for smooth transitions from landing to push-off. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14, however, features FF BLAST cushioning that provides a blend of cloud-like comfort and responsiveness. Both shoes emphasize comfort, but New Balance’s use of bio-based content in its midsole may appeal to those seeking eco-friendly options.

Stability Features

Stability is a crucial factor for many runners, and the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 excels with its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM. This adaptive stability feature ensures controlled deformation, providing support during runs. In contrast, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 relies on a well-structured upper and a gusseted tongue to keep debris out, promoting a secure fit but lacking the same level of stability technology as ASICS. Therefore, runners who prioritize stability might find the ASICS model more suitable for their needs.

Breathability and Fit

Both shoes offer breathable designs, but they achieve this in different ways. The ASICS Women’s GT-1000 14 uses an engineered mesh upper that reduces the need for overlays, promoting airflow. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 also features a synthetic and engineered mesh upper, designed for support and breathability while ensuring a customized fit with its adjustable lace closure. Ultimately, both options cater to breathability, but ASICS may provide slightly better airflow due to its lightweight upper design.

Weight and Performance

The ASICS Women’s GT-1000 14 is designed to be lightweight, enhancing performance during runs. While the specific weight isn’t detailed, the engineered mesh upper contributes to a lighter feel that is conducive to speed. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 1080 V14, while also performance-oriented, emphasizes comfort over sheer speed. This difference may appeal to different types of runners: those who prioritize lightweight performance might lean towards ASICS, whereas those seeking plush comfort might prefer New Balance.

Aesthetic Appeal

Aesthetic choices can influence a buyer's decision, and both shoes offer distinct looks. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 comes in a Winter SEA/White color scheme that combines style with functionality. On the other hand, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 is available in a sleek Black/Phantom/Sea Salt combination, appealing to those who prefer a more understated aesthetic. Aesthetics can be subjective, but both shoes provide options that cater to different style preferences for runners.

Brand Reputation and Sales Rank

In terms of brand reputation, both ASICS and New Balance are well-established names in the running shoe market. However, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 is currently ranked significantly higher as a bestseller, holding a sales rank of 1578 compared to the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 at 18558. This difference may indicate greater consumer trust and popularity for New Balance, potentially influencing a buyer's choice based on brand perception.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running Shoe ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities. If budget is a key consideration, the ASICS model is about 23% cheaper and offers excellent stability features. However, if you are looking for superior cushioning and a plush feel, the New Balance shoe's Fresh Foam X midsole may be worth the investment. Both shoes possess unique strengths, so it’s essential to match your running style and needs to the features offered by each model.