vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running

Updated August 2026 — New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running leads on eco-friendliness and comfort.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers a budget-friendly option with a focus on stability, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 excels in cushioning and modern design.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Price

ASICS is $30 cheaper

Sustainability

ASICS uses 50% recycled content

Stability

ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running is better

Cushioning

New Balance features Fresh Foam X midsole

Sales Rank

New Balance ranks 1,578 vs ASICS at 9,491

Design

New Balance has a modern aesthetic with no-sew overlays

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
78
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
BrandASICSNew Balance
ModelGT-2000 13Fresh Foam X 1080 V14
Upper MaterialJacquard meshSynthetic mesh
Midsole TechnologyPureGELFresh Foam X
WeightLightweightLightweight
FitComfortableCustomized

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running

Design and Aesthetics

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe offers a sleek design featuring a black and white color scheme, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running Shoe sports a more dynamic combination of black, phantom, and sea salt. The ASICS model incorporates a jacquard mesh upper designed for a supportive and comfortable fit, emphasizing both performance and style. In contrast, the New Balance shoe features a synthetic and engineered mesh upper, complete with no-sew overlays for a modern look. Both designs are functional, but the New Balance model's aesthetic may appeal more to those looking for a contemporary flair.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 excels with its Fresh Foam X midsole foam that provides an incredibly cushioned experience. It is designed for smooth transitions, making it suitable for both everyday wear and race day. The ASICS GT-2000 13 also offers significant cushioning through its rearfoot PureGEL technology, which focuses on lightweight cushioning and softer landings. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the New Balance model emphasizes a plush feel with its bio-based content in the foam, potentially offering a more environmentally friendly option.

Stability and Support

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is designed with a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that enhances stability for a smoother stride. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who require additional support during their runs. On the other hand, the New Balance model does not specify similar stability technologies but does include a gusseted tongue to keep debris out, which can enhance overall comfort and focus during runs. Runners seeking dedicated stability may lean towards the ASICS shoe, while those who prioritize a lightweight feel may prefer New Balance.

Environmental Impact

The ASICS GT-2000 13 incorporates sustainable practices by using at least 50% recycled content in the main upper material, contributing to waste reduction and lower carbon emissions. Additionally, its sockliner is produced using a solution dyeing process that conserves water and reduces carbon emissions by up to 45%. The New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 also focuses on sustainability, featuring a midsole foam with approximately 3% bio-based content derived from renewable resources. While both brands address environmental concerns, ASICS takes the lead with its more extensive use of recycled materials.

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is priced at $99.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14, which retails for $129.99. This price difference may be a significant factor for budget-conscious consumers looking for quality running shoes. The lower price of the ASICS model does not compromise its features, making it an attractive option for runners who want performance without breaking the bank.

Performance and Versatility

In terms of performance, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 is designed for versatility, catering to runners from casual joggers to serious athletes. Its cushioning and smooth transitions make it ideal for various running conditions. The ASICS GT-2000 13 is also performance-oriented, focusing on stability and comfort for longer runs. Both shoes are suitable for different types of runners, but the New Balance model may have an edge in terms of adaptability across different running scenarios.

Sales Rank and Market Reception

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 has a sales rank of 9,491, while the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 ranks significantly higher at 1,578. This difference indicates that the New Balance model is more popular among consumers, which could be attributed to its performance features and modern design. A higher bestseller rank often reflects consumer confidence and satisfaction, which may influence purchasing decisions for those comparing these two options.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. The ASICS model offers a more budget-friendly option with a focus on stability and sustainability, making it a great choice for those who prioritize these features. Meanwhile, the New Balance shoe provides superior cushioning and a modern aesthetic, appealing to those seeking versatility and comfort for various running situations. Consider your running style, budget, and design preferences to make the best choice for your needs.