vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, leads on comfort and breathability.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 offers advanced technology and energy return, while the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 excels in comfort and support at a lower price.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better

Price

ASICS is more expensive but offers advanced features.

Technology

Trampoline-inspired outsole enhances energy return.

Cushioning

FF BLAST MAX cushioning provides a soft landing.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Support

GuideRails system offers better stability.

Fit

Double jacquard knit upper provides a flexible fit.

Popularity

Higher bestseller rank indicates consumer trust.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,
85
Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGT-2000 14Glycerin GTS 22
UpperWoven meshDouble knit
OutsoleTrampoline podBroad platform
CushioningFF BLAST MAXDNA Tuned

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running

Pricing Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is about 17% cheaper than the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14, retailing at $114.95 compared to $139.95. This price difference might be significant for budget-conscious buyers looking for quality running shoes. The Glycerin GTS 22 offers a competitive price point while still providing advanced features and comfort. For those who prioritize value, the Brooks option could be a more attractive choice without sacrificing quality.

Brand Reputation

Both ASICS and Brooks are well-respected brands in the running shoe industry, but they cater to slightly different segments. ASICS has built a reputation for its innovative technologies aimed at enhancing performance, as seen in features like the trampoline-inspired outsole pod in the GT-2000 14. On the other hand, Brooks emphasizes comfort and support, as evidenced by the Glycerin GTS 22's GuideRails support system. The Glycerin GTS 22 holds a strong bestseller rank of 2097, indicating its popularity among consumers. This suggests that many runners trust Brooks for their supportive needs, while ASICS maintains a solid presence with the GT-2000 series.

Comfort and Fit

Comfort is crucial for any running shoe, and both models excel in this aspect but in different ways. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 features a woven mesh upper designed to keep your feet dry, along with a plush FF BLAST MAX cushioning unit for a soft landing and energized toe-off. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 offers a double jacquard knit upper for a flexible and accommodating fit, which enhances breathability and comfort. Each shoe provides a unique approach to comfort, making them suitable for varying preferences in fit and feel.

Technology and Features

In terms of technology, both shoes are equipped with advanced cushioning systems but differ in their approach. The ASICS GT-2000 14 utilizes a trampoline-inspired outsole pod to enhance energy return and stability during runs, combined with Rearfoot PureGEL technology for added softness. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 incorporates DNA Tuned cushioning, which blends dual-size cells for a balance of plush landings and responsive toe-offs. The GuideRails system further adds to its stability, keeping excess motion in check. This technological emphasis might sway buyers based on personal running style and needs.

Stability and Support

Stability and support are key considerations for runners, and both shoes offer unique solutions. The ASICS GT-2000 14 features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that adapts to the runner's needs, offering on-demand stability, while the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 incorporates the innovative GuideRails support system to manage excess motion. This makes the Glycerin GTS 22 particularly appealing for those who require additional support during their runs. The different approaches to stability may attract runners with varying levels of pronation or those engaged in different types of training.

Breathability

Breathability is another essential factor for running shoes, especially for long-distance runners. The ASICS GT-2000 14 is designed with a woven mesh upper that enhances airflow and helps keep feet dry during exercise. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22, on the other hand, features a double jacquard knit upper that ensures both durability and exceptional breathability. Both models excel in this area, but the choice may depend on personal preference and how much breathability a runner desires in their footwear.

Aesthetic Appeal

Aesthetic preference can play a significant role in purchasing decisions. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 comes in a Twilight Blue/White colorway, which offers a sleek and sporty look. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22, with its White/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue combination, presents a more contemporary and stylish option. Both shoes are visually appealing, but the final choice may boil down to individual taste in color and design.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, both the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 offer unique advantages tailored to different types of runners. If you are looking for a shoe that emphasizes cutting-edge technology and energy return, the ASICS model may be the better fit for you, despite its higher price tag of $139.95. However, if you prioritize comfort, support, and a lower price point, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 at $114.95 stands out as a strong contender with its exceptional cushioning and stability features. Ultimately, the best choice will depend on your specific running needs and personal preferences.