vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, wins on breathability and comfort, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running wins on style and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 offers superior stability, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 excels in comfort and cushioning.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better

Stability

ASICS features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for adaptive support.

Sales Rank

ASICS has a higher sales rank at 13,452.

Cushioning

ASICS uses FF BLAST MAX cushioning for enhanced toe-off.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running is better

Price

New Balance is priced at $129.99, about 7% cheaper.

Comfort

New Balance offers a highly cushioned Fresh Foam experience.

Breathability

New Balance includes a gusseted tongue for better fit.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
80

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
BrandASICSNew Balance
UpperWoven meshSynthetic mesh
OutsoleSynthetic rubberNo-sew overlays
WeightLightweightLightweight
Cushioning TypeFF BLAST MAXFresh Foam X

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running

Price Comparison

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running Shoe is priced at $129.99, making it about 7% cheaper than the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, which are priced at $139.95. While both shoes offer quality features and performance for runners, the price difference might influence budget-conscious buyers. The ASICS ranks at 13,452 in sales, while the New Balance has a significantly better sales rank of 1,578, indicating its popularity among consumers.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 excels with its Fresh Foam X midsole, designed for smooth transitions and offering incredible cushioning. This shoe promises a highly cushioned experience, perfect for long runs or daily wear. In comparison, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 features a trampoline-inspired outsole pod and FF BLAST MAX cushioning, which provides softness during landings and an energized toe-off. Both models prioritize comfort, but the New Balance focuses more on an overall cushioned experience, whereas ASICS aims for stability alongside comfort.

Breathability and Fit

Breathability is essential for running shoes, and both models boast features that enhance airflow. The ASICS GT-2000 14 includes a woven mesh upper designed to keep feet dry, while the New Balance 1080 V14 also features a synthetic and engineered mesh upper for breathability. The New Balance model includes a gusseted tongue to keep debris out, providing a snug fit that enhances comfort. Conversely, the ASICS model has an asymmetric tongue wing to secure the midfoot, reducing tongue movement. Thus, both shoes offer unique solutions for breathability and fit, catering to different runner preferences.

Stability and Support

Stability is a key factor for many runners, and the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 shines in this category with its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, an adaptive stability system designed to provide on-demand support. This feature can be particularly beneficial for runners needing extra stability during their runs. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14, while offering solid support, focuses more on comfort and cushioning. This distinction in priorities may lead runners who value stability to lean towards the ASICS model, while those valuing soft cushioning may prefer the New Balance.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, both the ASICS GT-2000 14 and New Balance 1080 V14 present appealing aesthetics. The ASICS model comes in a Twilight Blue/White color scheme, offering a vibrant option for runners who appreciate a pop of color. Conversely, the New Balance model features a more understated Black/Phantom/Sea Salt combination, appealing to those who prefer a classic look. Personal style may play a significant role in the decision-making process, as both options cater to different aesthetic tastes.

Durability and Construction

Durability is crucial for any running shoe, and both brands are recognized for their quality construction. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 features a synthetic rubber outsole and a woven mesh upper, designed for longevity and performance on various terrains. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 also boasts a durable construction with its no-sew overlays and engineered mesh upper. While both shoes are built to withstand regular use, the choice may come down to specific brand loyalty or personal experiences with durability in past purchases.

Performance on Different Surfaces

Both the ASICS GT-2000 14 and New Balance 1080 V14 are designed primarily for road running, but they may perform differently on various surfaces. The ASICS model's trampoline-inspired outsole and rearfoot PureGEL technology provide a bounce and softer landing, making it suitable for runners looking for stability on pavement. On the other hand, the New Balance's Fresh Foam X cushioning allows for smooth transitions, ideal for varied running surfaces. Ultimately, the choice of shoe may depend on the typical environments in which a runner trains or races.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 and New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 ultimately depends on individual preferences and running needs. If you prioritize stability and a more energized toe-off, the ASICS might be your best option, especially with its advanced stability features. However, if comfort and cushioning are more crucial for your runs, the New Balance offers an impressive, softer running experience. With the New Balance being about 7% cheaper and having a significantly better sales rank, it may also appeal more to value-driven shoppers. In the end, both shoes are excellent choices, so consider your specific running style and preferences when making your decision.