ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running leads on support and fit.
The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers better support and value, making it a more suitable choice for most runners.
Why ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl is better
Price
ASICS is more expensive.
Design
ASICS has a vibrant color scheme.
Traction
ASICS focuses on outdoor traction.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better
Comfort
Brooks offers superior cushioning.
Support
Brooks has GuideRails technology.
Popularity
Brooks has a better sales rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl | Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | FF BLAST MAX | DNA Tuned |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Double Knit |
| Outsole | AHAR® LO | Broad Platform |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
| Fit | Standard | Accommodating |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes are priced at $149.95, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running Shoe is significantly cheaper at $114.95, making it about 17% less expensive. This price difference may be a crucial factor for budget-conscious buyers looking for high-quality running shoes. The NOVABLAST 5 comes with a higher price tag, which could indicate advanced technology or features, but for those seeking value, the Glycerin GTS 22 offers an excellent option without compromising on quality.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 boasts a stylish design in Pearl Pink and Morganite, appealing to those who appreciate vibrant colors in their athletic wear. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 presents a more muted color scheme with White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue, which may cater to a different taste in aesthetics. Both shoes feature modern design elements intended for functionality, but the choice between them will depend largely on personal style preferences. The NOVABLAST 5's eye-catching hues could attract more fashion-forward runners, while the Glycerin GTS 22 offers a classic, versatile look.
Comfort and Fit
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 focuses on comfort with its breathable engineered jacquard mesh upper and tongue wing construction that enhances fit while minimizing tongue movement. This shoe provides FF BLAST MAX cushioning, promising a lightweight and energetic ride. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22, however, features DNA Tuned cushioning technology that ensures plush landings and responsive toe-offs. Its double jacquard knit upper enhances breathability and fit, making it accommodating for various foot shapes. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the Glycerin GTS 22 may excel in providing a more plush experience owing to its advanced cushioning system.
Performance and Technology
When it comes to performance, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 incorporates a trampoline-inspired outsole design that enhances bounce and responsiveness, making it ideal for energetic runners. The shoe’s AHAR® LO outsole rubber is designed for better traction on various terrains. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 emphasizes stability with its innovative GuideRails support system, which aids in reducing excess motion and promoting a natural running gait. This shoe is particularly beneficial for those who require additional support during their runs, suggesting that serious runners may lean towards the Glycerin GTS 22 for its performance-focused features.
Traction and Durability
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 uses AHAR® LO rubber in its outsole, which is engineered to enhance traction across different surfaces, allowing runners to confidently tackle various terrains. In comparison, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers a broad platform that provides stability and smooth transitions, ideal for running on roads or in the gym. Both shoes are built for durability, but the NOVABLAST 5’s specific focus on traction may make it preferable for outdoor enthusiasts who frequently run on varied surfaces.
Target Audience
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 is designed for those who seek a running shoe that delivers energy and responsiveness, making it suitable for runners looking for an invigorating experience during their workouts. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 caters to individuals who prioritize support and comfort, particularly beneficial for those engaging in longer runs or who may have stability needs. The NOVABLAST 5, with its energetic design and cushioning, may attract more performance-driven runners, while the Glycerin GTS 22 appeals to a broader audience, including those requiring a reliable everyday training shoe.
Sales and Popularity
In terms of sales rank, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is currently positioned at 2097, significantly higher than the ASICS NOVABLAST 5, which sits at 7224. This suggests that the Glycerin GTS 22 may be more popular among consumers, potentially due to its supportive features and more affordable price point. Popularity can indicate reliability and satisfaction among users, making the Glycerin GTS 22 a compelling choice for those looking for a well-regarded running shoe.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize a vibrant design and a lightweight, energetic feel during runs, the NOVABLAST 5 may be the right choice for you. However, if comfort, support, and a lower price point are your main concerns, the Glycerin GTS 22 stands out as an excellent option. With its advanced cushioning, support features, and higher popularity, the Glycerin GTS 22 is likely the more suitable option for many runners, making it the more compelling purchase overall.

