Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on waterproof and support, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running wins on breathability and weight.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offers superior waterproof features and support, while the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 provides better value and versatility.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Waterproof
Brooks has GORE-TEX technology.
Support
Brooks features Guiderails for stability.
Cushioning
Brooks uses DNA LOFT v2 for a softer ride.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running is better
Price
New Balance is $35 cheaper.
Sales Rank
New Balance is ranked 1578 vs 22780.
Versatility
New Balance is suitable for everyday and race day.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX | Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 |
| Weight | Light | Light |
| Upper | Air Mesh | Synthetic Mesh |
| Fit | Structured | Customizable |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running Shoe is about 21% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, priced at $129.99 compared to $165.00. This price difference of $35.01 could be significant for budget-conscious consumers who are looking for a high-quality running shoe without breaking the bank. While both shoes offer unique features, the cost factor may influence buyers who are deciding between investing in a premium shoe versus a more economical option.
Comfort and Cushioning
Both shoes are designed with comfort in mind, but they employ different technologies to achieve it. The New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 features a Fresh Foam X midsole foam that provides an incredible level of cushioning for smooth transitions. This design aims to enhance comfort during both casual runs and competitive races. Meanwhile, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX utilizes DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, which is noted for its softness and lightness, promising a smooth ride. While both shoes excel in cushioning, the specific experience may vary depending on individual preferences and running styles.
Fit and Support
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is particularly notable for its support features, including the Guiderails Holistic Support System, designed to align the body’s natural motion and minimize excess movement. This makes it a great choice for runners seeking stability. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 employs a gusseted tongue to keep debris out and has a no-sew overlay design for a more customized fit. While both shoes aim for a secure fit, the Brooks shoe is tailored more towards those needing extra support during their runs.
Upper Material and Breathability
The upper materials differ significantly between the two shoes. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features an engineered Air Mesh upper enhanced with 3D Fit Print technology, allowing for breathability and a structured fit. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 includes a synthetic and engineered mesh upper that promises lightness and breathability. Both designs aim to keep your feet comfortable for longer periods, but the Brooks shoe may offer a bit more structure due to its engineering.
Waterproof Features
A standout feature of the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is its GORE-TEX Invisible Fit technology, which provides breathable waterproof protection. This makes it an excellent option for runners who often face wet conditions or run in varied weather. The New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080, however, does not claim any waterproofing capabilities. For those prioritizing protection from the elements, the Brooks shoe is clearly the better choice.
Versatility
In terms of versatility, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 is marketed as a shoe that transitions well from everyday wear to race day, making it suitable for various occasions. It blends comfort and performance, appealing to a wider audience. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, while also suitable for road running and gym activities, is particularly aimed at those needing additional support and waterproof features. If versatility is a key factor, the Fresh Foam X 1080 may have the edge due to its broader application.
Performance and Popularity
When it comes to performance, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 is ranked significantly higher in sales, holding a bestseller rank of 1578 compared to the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX's rank of 22780. This indicates a higher demand and possibly more positive reception among runners, which could be a crucial consideration for potential buyers looking for a shoe that is tried and tested by a larger community.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, your choice between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 will depend on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize waterproof features and extra support, the Brooks may be the way to go despite its higher price. However, if you are looking for a more economical option that offers versatility and comfort, the New Balance is a compelling alternative. Both shoes have their unique strengths, so considering your running environment and personal preferences will guide you towards the right decision.

