Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price and fit, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running wins on style and performance.
The Brooks Glycerin 21 offers superior comfort at a lower price, while the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 provides eco-friendly cushioning and a modern design.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Brooks is $15 cheaper
Cushioning
Brooks emphasizes plush comfort
Fit
Brooks offers a more accommodating fit
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running is better
Performance
New Balance has a higher sales rank
Eco-friendliness
New Balance uses bio-based materials
Design
New Balance has a modern aesthetic
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Glycerin 21 | Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral |
| Upper | Warp Knit | Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Glycerin 21 and New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14
When comparing the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 1080 V14, both shoes exhibit features aimed at providing comfort and support for runners. The Brooks Glycerin 21 is priced at $114.95, while the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 comes at a higher price point of $129.99, making it about 13% more expensive. Both shoes are designed to cater to neutral support runners, but they offer distinct features that may appeal to different preferences.
Comfort and Cushioning
The Brooks Glycerin 21 offers "super-soft cushioning" through its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 material, which is designed for supreme comfort. This shoe is particularly suitable for runners seeking a plush experience, thanks to its internal stretch bootie that conforms to the foot. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 provides a unique cushioning experience through its Fresh Foam X midsole. This foam includes approximately 3% bio-based content, making it not only comfortable but also environmentally friendly. While both shoes prioritize cushioning, the Brooks model emphasizes a plush feel, while New Balance focuses on a combination of comfort and eco-friendliness.
Fit and Support
The fit of a running shoe is crucial, and the Brooks Glycerin 21 boasts a "plush improved fit" thanks to its breathable warp knit upper, which adapts to the foot’s movements. This is ideal for runners who appreciate a snug yet flexible fit. Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 features a synthetic and engineered mesh upper, complemented by a gusseted tongue designed to keep debris out. This design promotes a secure fit but may not have the same level of plushness as the Brooks version. Thus, while the Brooks Glycerin 21 may offer a more accommodating fit, the New Balance shoe provides a structured design that enhances stability.
Performance and Versatility
Both running shoes cater to various activities, but they have unique strengths. The Brooks Glycerin 21 is tailored for road running and cross-training, boasting a broad platform that stabilizes the foot for smooth transitions. It ranks 29,881 in sales, indicating its popularity among the running community. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 is marketed as an all-around performer suited for both everyday wear and race day, featuring smooth transitions from landing to push-off. Ranked at 1,578, it clearly appeals to a broader audience looking for high performance in diverse running settings.
Durability and Construction
Durability plays a key role in the longevity of running shoes. The Brooks Glycerin 21's DNA Loft v3 cushioning is designed to be lightweight, responsive, and durable, contributing to its overall lifespan. The shoe's construction emphasizes a soft feel without sacrificing performance, making it a reliable choice for regular use. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 incorporates no-sew overlays and a construction that focuses on breathability and support. This design not only enhances durability but also helps in maintaining comfort during longer runs. Both shoes promise a reasonable level of durability, but the Brooks emphasizes plush comfort, while New Balance leans towards a more performance-oriented construction.
Aesthetic Appeal
When it comes to aesthetics, both shoes present stylish options for women. The Brooks Glycerin 21 is available in a black, grey, and white color scheme that is versatile and suitable for various outfits. In comparison, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 features a modern look with a black, phantom, and sea salt combination, appealing to those who prefer a contemporary style. While both designs are visually appealing, the choice ultimately depends on personal preference and whether one leans towards a classic or a trendy aesthetic.
Pricing Considerations
With a retail price of $114.95, the Brooks Glycerin 21 is positioned as a more budget-friendly option compared to the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14, which retails for $129.99. This price difference of about $15 may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for a quality running shoe. Despite the higher price, the New Balance shoe justifies its cost with advanced cushioning technology and a focus on versatility. However, for those prioritizing comfort without breaking the bank, the Brooks Glycerin 21 could be the more attractive choice.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 ultimately comes down to individual preferences regarding comfort, fit, and budget. The Brooks Glycerin 21 excels in plush cushioning and offers a slightly lower price point, making it suitable for those seeking comfort during long runs. Meanwhile, the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 provides an eco-friendly cushioning experience and a modern design, appealing to those willing to invest a bit more for versatility and performance. Consider your running style, preferences, and budget to make an informed decision that best suits your needs.

