vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running vs Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running wins on sales rank and support, Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium wins on weight.

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 offers better support and cushioning, making it a more versatile choice for runners, while the Hoka Women’s Rincon 4 excels in lightweight comfort.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Price

Glycerin GTS 22 is $114.95, cheaper than Rincon 4 at $122.49.

Support

Glycerin GTS 22 features GuideRails support for stability.

Sales Rank

Glycerin GTS 22 has a higher sales rank of 2097.

Why Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium is better

Weight

Rincon 4 is designed to be ultra-lightweight.

Cushioning

Rincon 4 offers cloud-weight cushioning for long distances.

Fit

Rincon 4 has a more foot-hugging fit.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
85
Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium
78

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningHoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium
CushioningDNA TunedCloud-Weight
Support TechGuideRailsNone
Upper MaterialDouble JacquardEngineered Jacquard
OutsoleBroad PlatformRubberized EVA
FitAccommodatingFoot-Hugging

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningHoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is priced at $114.95, while the Hoka Women’s Rincon 4 is available for $122.49. This makes the Glycerin GTS 22 about 6% cheaper than the Rincon 4. If you're looking for a more budget-friendly option, the Brooks shoe could be the better choice without sacrificing quality. Both shoes offer excellent features, but if price is a crucial factor for you, the Glycerin GTS 22 takes the lead.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 excels with its DNA Tuned cushioning technology, designed to provide plush landings and energetic toe-offs. This shoe aims to deliver a smooth running experience through its dual-size cells. The Hoka Women’s Rincon 4, on the other hand, is known for its cloud-weight cushion, featuring an upgraded foam that enhances rebound and softness over longer distances. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Glycerin GTS 22 focuses on a balance of cushioning and support, whereas the Rincon 4 emphasizes lightweight softness.

Support Features

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 includes innovative GuideRails support that maintains your body's natural motion path while minimizing excess movement. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners seeking stability and support during their runs. The Hoka Women’s Rincon 4 does not specifically mention similar support technology, as its focus lies more on cushioning and lightweight design. If you require extra support while running, the Glycerin GTS 22 is tailored to meet those needs effectively.

Fit and Design

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is designed with a double jacquard knit upper that offers a flexible and accommodating fit, promoting breathability and durability. Meanwhile, the Hoka Women’s Rincon 4 features an engineered double jacquard upper with a more foot-hugging fit than its predecessors. While both shoes provide a snug fit, the Glycerin GTS 22 may offer slightly more room for those who prefer a more accommodating feel, making it suitable for various foot shapes.

Weight Considerations

In terms of weight, the Hoka Women’s Rincon 4 is designed to be ultra-lightweight, making it an excellent choice for runners who prioritize speed and agility. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22, although cushioned, doesn't emphasize lightweight design as much as the Rincon 4. If you're a runner focused on distance and speed without the extra weight, the Rincon 4 may be more appealing. However, if you prefer a balance of comfort and support, the Glycerin GTS 22 still holds its ground.

Durability and Longevity

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 is engineered for durability and features a broad platform that stabilizes the foot for smooth transitions. Similarly, the Hoka Women’s Rincon 4 incorporates a rubberized EVA outsole designed for longevity, which works in tandem with an upgraded foam for sustained softness over time. Both shoes are built to last, but the Glycerin GTS 22’s focus on stability may make it more suitable for varied terrains, while the Rincon 4 shines on flat surfaces.

Sales Rank and Popularity

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 holds a sales rank of 2097, indicating a solid level of popularity among consumers. In comparison, the Hoka Women’s Rincon 4 has a lower sales rank of 17234. While both shoes are well-regarded, the Glycerin GTS 22 appears to be more preferred by runners, likely due to its supportive features and overall comfort. This popularity may speak to the reliability of the Glycerin GTS 22 in meeting the needs of a broader range of runners.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 and the Hoka Women’s Rincon 4 ultimately depends on your individual needs as a runner. If you prioritize support, cushioning, and a slightly lower price, the Glycerin GTS 22 is an excellent choice, especially for those who may require additional stability. Conversely, if you're looking for an ultra-lightweight shoe designed for speed and comfort, the Rincon 4 could be the better fit. Both options have their strengths, but understanding your specific running needs will help you make the best decision.