vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running wins on support and fit, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe wins on weight and style.

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers superior support and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 is a budget-friendly option for casual wear.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Support

Features GuideRails for enhanced stability.

Cushioning

Utilizes advanced DNA Tuned cushioning technology.

Sales Rank

Higher sales rank indicates stronger market presence.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe is better

Price

Significantly cheaper at $85.40.

Weight

Lightweight construction reduces fatigue.

Versatility

Stylish design suitable for casual wear.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe
70

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe
BrandBrooksNew Balance
ModelGlycerin GTS 22Fresh Foam x Cruz V3
CushioningDNA TunedFresh Foam X
SupportGuideRailsNone
UpperDouble JacquardKnit

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe

Overview of the Products

In this comparison, we will examine the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running Shoe and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe. The Brooks shoe retails for $114.95, while the New Balance option is priced at $85.40, making it about 17% cheaper than the Brooks shoe. Both shoes are designed for running but cater to different needs and preferences.

Comfort and Fit

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is engineered with a double jacquard knit upper that offers a flexible and accommodating fit, enhancing durability and breathability. This shoe features DNA Tuned cushioning, which ensures soft landings and responsive toe-offs, making it a great option for long runs. Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 also prioritizes comfort with its breathable knit upper. While both shoes aim for comfort, the Brooks shoe offers advanced cushioning technology that may appeal to those seeking a more plush experience, especially during extended wear.

Support Features

Support is a key differentiator between these two running shoes. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 includes the innovative GuideRails system, designed to support your body’s natural motion while minimizing excess movement. This makes it particularly suitable for runners needing extra stability. The New Balance Fresh Foam x Cruz V3, while comfortable, does not emphasize specialized support features like the Brooks shoe, making it a better fit for casual runners or those who don't require additional stabilization.

Weight and Construction

The Brooks shoe is built for performance with a focus on robust cushioning and support, which may contribute to a slightly heavier construction. The New Balance Fresh Foam x Cruz V3, on the other hand, is designed to be lightweight, reducing fatigue during runs. While the exact weights are not specified, the lightweight construction of the New Balance shoe appeals to those looking for a nimble shoe for everyday wear, contrasting with the more performance-oriented build of the Brooks.

Versatility

In terms of versatility, the New Balance Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 shines with its stylish design that makes it suitable not just for running but also for lifestyle wear. It’s marketed as a go-to shoe for everyday wear, which can be an attractive feature for those looking to transition from workout to casual settings seamlessly. Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is ideal for various training activities, including road running and cross-training, but its more pronounced performance features may limit its appeal as a casual footwear choice.

Durability

When it comes to durability, both shoes are constructed to withstand regular use. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, indicating its robustness and suitability for various foot types. The New Balance Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 features a durable rubber outsole, which promises lasting performance mile after mile. While both shoes are built to last, the Brooks shoe may offer an edge in terms of long-term stability and performance, especially for avid runners.

Price Comparison

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is priced at $114.95, while the New Balance Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 comes in at $85.40. This price difference of approximately $29.55 makes the New Balance option significantly more budget-friendly—about 17% less expensive. For those on a tighter budget or looking for a running shoe that balances performance with cost, the New Balance could be the better choice.

Sales Performance

Looking at sales performance, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 ranks at 2,097 in sales, indicating a strong presence in the market and a level of consumer trust in its performance. In comparison, the New Balance Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 has a sales rank of 15,925, suggesting it may not be as popular among serious runners. This could reflect a difference in target audience, with Brooks appealing more to those seeking high-performance running shoes.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 ultimately comes down to individual needs. If you prioritize advanced support and cushioning for longer runs, the Brooks shoe is likely the better option, despite its higher price. However, if you’re looking for a versatile, budget-friendly shoe that excels in comfort and casual wear, the New Balance Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 stands out as a solid choice. Each shoe has its unique strengths, so consider your running style and budget when making your decision.