vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running vs Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running wins on fit and cushioning, Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, wins on breathability.

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers superior support and advanced technology, while the Under Armour Charged Surge 4 is a budget-friendly option with decent comfort.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Support

Glycerin GTS 22 features GuideRails for enhanced stability.

Cushioning

DNA Tuned cushioning provides plush support.

Versatility

Ideal for various activities including road running and cross training.

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, is better

Price

Charged Surge 4 is significantly cheaper.

Weight

Lighter design at 10.05 oz.

Flexibility

Offers a balance of flexibility and cushioning.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
85
Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,
70

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningUnder Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,
CushioningDNA TunedCharged Cushioning
UpperDouble Jacquard KnitBreathable Mesh
Sales Rank20972697
FitAccommodatingStandard
Support SystemGuideRailsNone

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningUnder Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,

Price Comparison

When considering price, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is about 55% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22, retailing at $51.95 compared to $114.95. This significant price difference makes the Charged Surge 4 an appealing option for budget-conscious buyers. While the Glycerin GTS 22 offers advanced features and technology, the Charged Surge 4 provides excellent value for those seeking a reliable running shoe without breaking the bank.

Comfort and Fit

In terms of comfort, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 emphasizes a luxurious experience with its DNA Tuned cushioning technology, designed for soft landings and responsive toe-offs. The shoe features an accommodating fit due to its double jacquard knit upper, enhancing both breathability and durability. On the other hand, the Charged Surge 4 also prioritizes comfort with its Deluxe Comfort System sockliner that molds to the foot, along with enhanced cushioning around the ankle collar. While both shoes excel in comfort, the Glycerin GTS 22 caters to those looking for plush support, whereas the Charged Surge 4 offers a balance of cushioning and flexibility.

Design and Aesthetics

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 presents a stylish appearance with its white, limpet shell, and amparo blue color scheme, appealing to those who appreciate a chic look in their running shoes. The Under Armour Charged Surge 4, in contrast, comes in a clean white with distant gray and metallic silver accents, offering a more understated aesthetic. Both shoes have their unique visual appeal, but the choice depends on personal style preference.

Technology and Features

Technology plays a crucial role in both models. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 incorporates the innovative GuideRails support system, which helps maintain proper alignment and stability during runs. This shoe is also certified as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, targeting specific needs for certain runners. The Under Armour Charged Surge 4 features Charged Cushioning in its midsole, delivering responsiveness and durability throughout the day. Each shoe has unique technical advantages, but the Glycerin GTS 22 offers more specialized support.

Performance and Support

When it comes to performance, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 shines with its broad platform that stabilizes the foot during transitions and its GuideRails system that assists in controlling excess motion. With a sales rank of 2097, it is also recognized for its support capabilities. The Under Armour Charged Surge 4, while well-rated at a sales rank of 2697, is more suited for neutral runners seeking a balance of flexibility and cushioning. Those requiring additional support may find the Glycerin GTS 22 more suitable for their needs.

Durability

Durability is a key factor for runners, and both shoes are built to last. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features a robust build designed for various running conditions. Its engineered upper and high-quality materials contribute to its longevity. Similarly, the Under Armour Charged Surge 4 boasts a durable rubber outsole that provides traction and flexibility, ensuring it can withstand regular use. Both shoes are constructed for durability, but the Glycerin GTS 22 is designed with specific support features that may enhance its lifespan under rigorous conditions.

Usage and Versatility

In terms of usage, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is ideal for road running, cross training, and gym workouts, making it a versatile choice for active individuals. Its supportive features cater to various activities, providing stability and comfort. The Charged Surge 4 is also versatile, recommended for runners who appreciate a balance between flexibility and cushioning. While both shoes can be used across different settings, the Glycerin GTS 22 may appeal more to those who prioritize support in their workouts.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, your decision between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 should be based on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a high-end running shoe with advanced support features and are willing to invest in quality, the Glycerin GTS 22 is an excellent choice. However, if you are budget-conscious and seek a reliable shoe for casual running or workouts, the Charged Surge 4 offers great value without compromising on comfort. Each shoe has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of runners.