vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running

Updated August 2026 — New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running leads on comfort and design.

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 offers a more affordable option with excellent cushioning, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 excels in high-performance features and modern design.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral is better

Price

Brooks is $15 cheaper

Cushioning

DNA Tuned cushioning provides plush landings

Fit

Accommodating fit with flat knit upper

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running is better

Performance

Fresh Foam X offers superior cushioning

Design

Modern aesthetic with no-sew overlays

Breathability

Engineered mesh upper enhances airflow

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral
82
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
88

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 NeutralNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running
CushioningDNA TunedFresh Foam X
Upper MaterialFlat KnitEngineered Mesh
WeightLightLight
SupportNeutralNeutral
Lace TypeStandardAdjustable

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 NeutralNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 is priced at $114.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 retails for $129.99, making the Brooks shoe about 17% cheaper. This price difference may be significant for budget-conscious buyers. The Glycerin Stealthfit 22 not only offers a more affordable option but also provides high-quality features designed for running enthusiasts. On the other hand, the Fresh Foam X 1080, despite its higher price, brings its own set of advanced technologies that may justify the cost for serious runners.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort and cushioning, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 excels with its Fresh Foam X midsole foam, which is designed to deliver an incredibly cushioned experience. This shoe is specifically engineered for smooth transitions from landing to push-off, providing a premium feel. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 features DNA Tuned cushioning technology, designed to blend plush landings with responsive toe-offs. While both shoes focus on comfort, the unique construction of the Fresh Foam X may appeal to those prioritizing cushioning in their running experience.

Design and Aesthetics

Both shoes offer appealing designs, but they cater to different aesthetic preferences. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 comes in a sleek White/Grey/Black colorway, which exudes a classic running shoe vibe. Its updated flat knit upper provides a modern touch. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 sports a Black/Phantom/Sea Salt palette, presenting a more contemporary look with no-sew overlays and a synthetic engineered mesh upper. Depending on personal style, buyers may prefer the traditional look of the Brooks shoe or the modern design of the New Balance model.

Fit and Adjustability

Fit is crucial in running shoes, and both models offer features to enhance comfort. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 boasts an accommodating fit with its soft, flat knit upper that moves with the foot, ensuring a natural feel. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 features an adjustable lace closure for a customized fit, alongside a gusseted tongue to keep debris out. While both shoes serve to provide a secure fit, the Brooks model may appeal more to those who value a seamless integration of fit and comfort.

Performance and Support

When it comes to performance, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 is designed for neutral support and offers maximum cushioning, making it ideal for various activities like road running and cross-training. This versatility is enhanced by its broad platform that stabilizes the foot. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14, while also suitable for road running, emphasizes a blend of comfort and high performance, allowing for smooth transitions. Depending on the runner's needs, those requiring neutral support may lean towards Brooks, while athletes seeking high-performance comfort may prefer New Balance.

Breathability

Breathability is another important factor in choosing running shoes. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 is designed with a synthetic and engineered mesh upper, promoting airflow and keeping feet cool during runs. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 also offers a breathable flat knit upper that allows for ventilation. Both shoes prioritize breathability, but the engineered mesh of the New Balance model may provide a slight edge in terms of airflow during long runs.

Durability and Longevity

Durability is a key consideration for any running shoe, especially for frequent runners. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 has shown to maintain a solid bestseller rank of 14,424, indicating its popularity and reliability among users. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 is also highly rated, with a sales rank of 1,578, suggesting strong market performance. Both shoes are built to last, but the Brooks model’s proven track record may reassure buyers of its long-term durability.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities. The Brooks shoe offers a more budget-friendly option with excellent cushioning and a comfort-focused fit, making it suitable for a range of activities. In contrast, the New Balance shoe is ideal for those seeking high-performance features and modern design at a higher price point. If you prioritize affordability and comfort, the Brooks may be the better choice; however, if you are willing to invest more in cutting-edge technology and style, the New Balance could be worth the extra cost.