adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running leads on support and stability.
The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers superior support and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the adidas Swift Run is a stylish and budget-friendly option for casual wear.
Why adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 is better
Price
adidas Swift Run is $79.95, cheaper than Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 at $114.95.
Style
adidas Swift Run has a sleek and minimalist design.
Lightweight
adidas Swift Run is designed for all-day comfort with lightweight cushioning.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better
Support
Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features GuideRails for enhanced stability.
Cushioning
Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 uses advanced DNA Tuned cushioning technology.
Durability
Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 has a double jacquard knit upper for long-lasting wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 | Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Swift Run | Glycerin GTS 22 |
| Upper Material | Knit | Double Jacquard |
| Cushioning Tech | EVA | DNA Tuned |
| Fit | Runs Big | Accommodating |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the adidas Womens Swift Run and Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22
The adidas Womens Swift Run is priced at $79.95, making it about 30% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22, which retails for $114.95. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious shoppers. However, the Glycerin GTS 22 boasts advanced features, including a supportive design and cutting-edge cushioning technology, which may justify its higher price for serious runners.
Design and Aesthetics
The adidas Womens Swift Run features a sleek and minimalist design, primarily in white with gold metallic accents. This stylish look is ideal for casual wear and everyday use. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 combines white with limpets shell and amparo blue, offering a more vibrant and dynamic appearance. While both shoes are visually appealing, the choice between them often comes down to personal style preferences.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is paramount in running shoes, and both models approach this differently. The adidas Swift Run is designed for all-day comfort with a flexible upper and lightweight cushioning, making it suitable for casual wear. However, it runs big, suggesting that buyers should consider purchasing a half size smaller for the best fit. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features DNA Tuned cushioning technology that provides plush landings and energetic toe-offs, making it ideal for both road running and gym activities. Its accommodating fit and engineered upper enhance breathability and comfort, especially for longer runs.
Performance and Support
When it comes to performance, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 stands out due to its advanced support features. It incorporates the GuideRails holistic support system, which helps maintain proper foot alignment and stability during runs. The shoe is designed for smooth transitions, making it suitable for various activities, including cross-training. In contrast, the adidas Swift Run focuses on lightweight cushioning and flexibility, making it more suited for casual or light running rather than intense workouts.
Cushioning Technology
Cushioning is a critical aspect of running shoes, and here the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 excels with its DNA Tuned cushioning. This technology uses dual-size cells to provide a perfect blend of plush comfort and responsiveness. The larger cells in the heel ensure soft landings, while the smaller cells in the forefoot facilitate quick toe-offs. The adidas Swift Run, while offering lightweight EVA midsole cushioning, does not match the advanced features of the Glycerin GTS 22, which may be a deciding factor for serious runners.
Durability and Construction
Durability is essential for any running shoe, and both brands are known for their quality. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features a double jacquard knit upper designed for durability while ensuring excellent breathability. This construction allows for long-lasting wear even under rigorous use. The adidas Swift Run also boasts a flexible upper and textile lining, providing a soft feel; however, its construction is geared more towards casual wear, which may not withstand the demands of extensive running as effectively as the Brooks model.
Pricing and Value
The adidas Womens Swift Run offers a more budget-friendly option at $79.95, which is about 30% less than the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 priced at $114.95. For those looking for stylish shoes for casual outings or light running, the Swift Run presents excellent value. However, for serious runners seeking advanced features, support, and cushioning, the higher investment in the Glycerin GTS 22 could provide greater long-term satisfaction and performance benefits.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the adidas Womens Swift Run and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize style, affordability, and comfort for everyday use, the Swift Run is an excellent choice. However, if you are a serious runner looking for superior support, cushioning technology, and durability, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 justifies its higher price with advanced performance features. Consider what aspects matter most to you before making a decision.

