vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running leads on cushioning and support.

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers superior support and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better

Support

Glycerin GTS 22 features GuideRails for enhanced stability.

Cushioning

DNA Tuned cushioning provides better comfort.

Popularity

Higher bestseller rank indicates greater consumer preference.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better

Price

Fresh Foam 680 v9 is significantly cheaper.

Weight

Lighter design for easier wear.

Simplicity

Straightforward design appeals to minimalists.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
70

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
BrandBrooksNew Balance
ModelGlycerin GTS 22Fresh Foam 680 v9
Upper MaterialDouble Jacquard KnitEngineered Mesh
MidsoleDNA TunedFresh Foam
OutsoleRubberIntegrated Rubber

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive RunningNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Overview of the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 and New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is priced at $114.95, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 comes in significantly lower at $72.24, making it about 37% cheaper. Both shoes cater to runners looking for a comfortable and supportive experience, but they differ in technology and design features. The Glycerin GTS 22 is designed for a more supportive run with its innovative GuideRails system, whereas the Fresh Foam 680 v9 focuses on lightweight cushioning and comfort.

Design and Aesthetics

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 features a stylish combination of white, limpet shell, and amparo blue, providing a sleek look for any runner. The double jacquard knit upper not only enhances its aesthetic appeal but also offers durability and breathability. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 presents a more straightforward design with a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper. While both shoes are visually appealing, the Glycerin GTS 22 leans towards a more dynamic and modern look, which may attract those who value stylish athletic wear.

Comfort and Fit

In terms of comfort, the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 excels with its DNA Tuned cushioning, which ensures soft landings and responsive toe-offs. This shoe is designed with an accommodating fit, making it suitable for various foot shapes. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 offers a lightweight ride with its Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, making it incredibly comfortable for short to medium runs. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Glycerin GTS 22's advanced cushioning technology gives it a slight edge for runners who need extra support during longer distances.

Support and Stability

Support is a critical aspect for many runners, and the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 shines here with its GuideRails holistic support system. This feature helps stabilize the foot by controlling excess motion, which is especially beneficial for those with specific gait issues. Although the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 provides underfoot comfort through its integrated rubber outsole, it does not have the same level of support as the Glycerin GTS 22. For runners who prioritize stability, the Glycerin GTS 22 stands out as the better option.

Performance on Different Terrains

Both shoes are designed for running, but they may perform differently on various terrains. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is ideal for road running and cross-training, thanks to its broad platform that stabilizes the foot and smooth heel-to-toe transitions. This makes it a versatile choice for diverse workout settings. Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 is also suitable for running but may not provide the same level of stability on uneven surfaces. Runners who frequently switch between terrains might prefer the Glycerin GTS 22 for its superior adaptability.

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 is significantly more budget-friendly at $72.24 compared to the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22's $114.95. This difference of about $42.71 makes the Fresh Foam 680 v9 an attractive option for budget-conscious runners. However, it's essential to weigh this savings against the advanced features and support offered by the Glycerin GTS 22, which may justify its higher price for some consumers.

User Rankings and Popularity

The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 has a bestseller rank of 2097, indicating a solid level of popularity among runners who seek a supportive shoe. In comparison, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 has a lower sales rank of 13435, suggesting that it is less popular among consumers. While sales rank does not directly correlate to quality, it can provide insight into consumer preferences and the reputation of each brand within the running community.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 and the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 ultimately depends on your individual running needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced support, cushioning technology, and a stylish design, the Glycerin GTS 22 is well worth the investment at $114.95. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers comfort for shorter runs, the Fresh Foam 680 v9 at $72.24 is an excellent choice. Factor in your running habits, terrain, and personal preference to make the best decision for your footwear needs.